Two weeks ago I saw on various news pages, not so surprising news of how the Beijing Olympic nest and water cube , both used in the Olympics Last year, be reformed because of the impossibility to defray the costs of maintenance
This office would be posted in the case of the cube by eliminating much of the bleachers, and if the nest mall.
The nest, a project of Herzog & de Meuron 1 2
the bucket 1 2
I express my sorrow at this decision and ask the following question: architectural spaces for temporary use for certain events should be provided once completed its deconstruction that event, or when trying to create a significant milestone should be scheduled to remodeling to another use, and do not go as in this case that the new use is part of a bad architecture and product of simple partitioning (if the renovation had been planned by the same architects that picked him up, important concepts such as light, space and program, including others would not be free will and would also be a consequence of projecting). This is not the blame or point fingers with the finger, but it is something that the organization should anticipate and propose in the contest.
Well for example in the case of the Madrid Olympic Stadium will be to the comb which later became a property of Atletico Madrid, is set later use, while in Beijing since the end of the Olympics hosted two events only.
digital images that will be the stage of the comb olímplico
Another similar case was the flag of Spain EXPO Corrales made by and Molezún was also ordered to abandon ...
And you, do you know any cases like these, or in case there is a good rehabilitation purposes next?
flag image used on the Brussels Expo
Darius
0 comments:
Post a Comment